托福寫(xiě)作中得高分具備怎樣的特點(diǎn)?今天我們說(shuō)明下結(jié)尾段的寫(xiě)作要領(lǐng)。一個(gè)段落必須有一個(gè)中心即主題思想，有若干推展句、論據(jù)。托福寫(xiě)作中要申明立場(chǎng)，引申擴(kuò)展，總結(jié)理由，美國(guó)喜歡用先點(diǎn)名立場(chǎng)的形式，作為托福寫(xiě)作我們最好沿用美國(guó)作文中的喜歡以取得更高的分?jǐn)?shù)。

托福考試作文結(jié)尾段的四大天王：重申立場(chǎng)；重申立場(chǎng)+總結(jié)理由；讓步+重申立場(chǎng)；重申立場(chǎng)+引申擴(kuò)展。

引申擴(kuò)展包括：強(qiáng)調(diào)反對(duì)派立場(chǎng)會(huì)帶來(lái)的后果；展望未來(lái)問(wèn)題的前景；強(qiáng)調(diào)重要性。

具體我們可以參看一下下面的實(shí)例：

1.重申立場(chǎng)

“It is difficult for people to achieve professional success without sacrificing important aspects of a fulfilling personal life.”

In conclusion, given the growing demands of career on today’s professionals, a fulfilling personal life remains possible by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices.

2.重申立場(chǎng)+總結(jié)理由

“Since science and technology are becoming more and more essential to modern society, schools should devote more time to teaching science and technology and less to teaching the arts and humanities.”

In conclusion, schools should not devote less time to the arts and humanities. These areas of study augment and enhance learning in mathematics and science, as well as helping to preserve the richness of our entire human legacy while inspiring us to further it. Moreover, disciplines within the humanities provide methods and contexts for evaluating the morality of our technology and for determining its proper direction.

3.讓步+重申立場(chǎng)

“Job security and salary should be based on employee performance, not on years of service. Rewarding employees primarily for years of service discourages people from maintaining consistently high levels of productivity.”

In the final analysis, the statement correctly identifies job performance as the single best criterion for salary and job security. However, the statement goes too far, it ignores the fact that a cost-of-living salary increase for tenured employees not only enhances loyalty and, in the end, productivity, but also is required by fairness.

4.重申立場(chǎng)+引申擴(kuò)展

How far should a supervisor go in criticizing the performance of a subordinate? Some highly successful managers have been known to rely on verbal abuse and intimidation. Do you think that this is an effective means of communicating expectations? If not, what alternative should a manager use in dealing with someone whose work is less than satisfactory?

In conclusion, supervisors should avoid using verbal abuse and threats. These methods degrade subordinates, and they are unlikely to produce the best results in the long run. It is more respectful, and probably more effective overall, to handle cases of substandard work performance with clear, honest and supportive feedback.

以上是托福寫(xiě)作中我們需要注意的內(nèi)容，其中收尾段要和中間段落清晰分開(kāi)，每段的中心思想清晰明白，不可含糊，鮮明亮快的寫(xiě)作風(fēng)格會(huì)給你的作文加分不少。