450)=450">
本期選段中Dr. Lightman他們在討論那個高中生是否有預謀，但是貌似那位“官員”不太相信他們的工作，但是他的動作表情也同樣出賣了自己，揭露了另一個隱情。。。會是什么呢？一起來看看吧~~大家不妨注意一下Dr. Lightman看人的表情，哈哈，局外人表示很好玩~~



So you got a sense of his intent?
When I asked James about his best race, he broke 1_________in order to remember and answer truthfully. And when I asked him about his run the night of the murder, he never broke eye contact. He wasn't recalling a memory. 2_______________.
But I thought most people avoid eye contact when they're lying.
No, it's a 3_____. And quite often, they make more eye contact. They need to watch, see if you 4________________.
The content analysis would suggest that James has been to Ms. McCartney's house before. Question: "Have you ever been to her house?" Answer: "No, I have never been to her house." Rigid repetion like that is typical of a lie.
Okay, so you'll tell the mayor's office the murder was premeditated? Looks that way. But when I asked him about his teacher's death, what we saw was this:
Oblique eyebrows.
5_______.
Why would he be hiding sadness for her?
6__________________.
It's possible he 7____________________.
Excuse me?
Could have been an accident.
Okay. Okay, I indulged the mayor's office in letting you talk to the kid, but now you're just making 8_________ that have no basis in 9________. This was no accident. And personally, I think what you do is a joke. It's a friggin' carnival act.
Oh, yeah, yeah, I get that a lot.

eye contact He was lying myth believe their lies Sadness Looks like guilt to me didn't mean to kill his teacher wild guesses hard evidence
知道他的目的了嗎？ 我問起James的最好成績，他終止了眼神交流，努力回憶并如實回答。但我問起謀殺當晚的跑步情況，他卻一直看著我，并未回憶什么，而是在撒謊。 大部分人撒謊時都避免眼神交流的吧。 不，那是假的。他們會經(jīng)常做更多眼神交流，他們需要觀察，看你是否相信他們的謊言。 內容分析顯示，James之前曾去過McCartney小姐的家。我問他“你之前去過她家嗎？”回答“沒有，我之前從未去過她家?！蓖耆瞻岬闹貜突卮?，是典型的謊言。 好了，你們能告訴市長他是有預謀的嘍？ 似乎如此。 但當我說起老師的死，我們看到的是這個：眉毛掛下來了。 悲傷。為什么要掩飾悲傷呢？ 我看是罪惡感。 也有可能，他不是有意殺人。 什么？ 可能是意外。 是嗎？我遷就市長辦公室的人，讓你跟這個孩子談，現(xiàn)在你卻在無可靠證據(jù)的情況下大膽猜測，這不是意外。我個人覺得，你們這一行簡直是笑話，完全隨心所欲嘛。 是啊，是啊，經(jīng)常有人這么說。