【TED】是一個(gè)會(huì)議的名稱，它是英文technology,entertainment, design三個(gè)單詞的首字母縮寫(xiě)。它是社會(huì)各界精英交流的盛會(huì)，這里有當(dāng)代最杰出的思想家，這里有當(dāng)代最優(yōu)秀的科學(xué)家，這里有迸發(fā)著最閃耀的思想火花，這里孕育著最光輝的夢(mèng)想。

理查德·威爾金森認(rèn)為收入差距巨大的社會(huì)通常是有問(wèn)題的。理查德·威爾金森用硬數(shù)據(jù)制作了一系列關(guān)于經(jīng)濟(jì)失衡的圖表，并列舉了當(dāng)貧富差距過(guò)大時(shí)，我們社會(huì)出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題，包括：健康、壽命、甚至基本價(jià)值觀.
【本節(jié)目每天下午2點(diǎn)更新，歡迎訂閱?！?br>
【全文聽(tīng)寫(xiě)】
Hints：
Nordic
inequality
Japan
gradient
I've shown you just a few things in italics here. I could have shown a number of other problems. They're all problems that tend to be more common at the bottom of the social gradient. But there are endless problems with social gradients that are worse in more unequal countries not just a little bit worse, but anything from twice as common to 10 times as common. Think of the expense, the human cost of that. I want to go back though to this graph that I showed you earlier where we put it all together to make two points. One is that, in graph after graph, we find the countries that do worse, whatever the outcome, seem to be the more unequal ones, and the ones that do well seem to be the Nordic countries and Japan. So what we're looking at is general social disfunction related to inequality. It's not just one or two things that go wrong, it's most things.
我已經(jīng)展示過(guò)的在這里用斜體字標(biāo)記。 我還可以展示一些其它的問(wèn)題。那些問(wèn)題都更普遍存在 于社會(huì)梯度的底層。但是社會(huì)梯度存在著無(wú)窮的題，這些問(wèn)題在不平等的國(guó)家顯得更糟,不僅僅是一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)糟， 而是什么都要差到2 倍, 10 倍。想想花費(fèi),人力成本的花費(fèi)。 我想回到這張先前展示過(guò)的圖 我們把所有都結(jié)合起來(lái) 為了說(shuō)明兩點(diǎn)。 第一，通過(guò)一張復(fù)一張的圖表，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)那些表現(xiàn)較差的國(guó)家， 無(wú)論什么， 都似乎是那些更不平等的國(guó)家， 但是那些表現(xiàn)得好的 似乎都是北歐和日本。 所以我們看到的是 普遍社會(huì)紊亂與不平等之間的關(guān)系。 不僅僅是一兩件事出了問(wèn)題， 而是幾乎所有事。