Hints:

hands-on

CVs - checking

, though – except

reliable - is

that - perhaps

?

英式拼寫

不寫數(shù)字編號(hào),直接聽寫說話內(nèi)容

We all forget how hard interviews can be. Applicants walk into a strange room and face what can be a long line of unknown people who fire a lot of tricky questions at them. It's not surprising that their minds go a complete blank. If you're the interviewer and you make an effort to put the interviewees at their ease, then they're more likely to express their opinions coherently and give you a chance to assess them properly. Interviews are often too theoretical. You get the applicant's views on, for example, the principles of marketing and then throw in some tough questions to see if they're up to speed on the latest developments. But introducing a hands-on activity can be more telling, because then you can assess how they approach everyday activities. I know some people argue that at senior level it's a waste of time and you should be checking how they deal with clients and colleagues, but I'm not convinced. You have perhaps 30 minutes to assess an applicant. I think considerable work needs to be done beforehand with the CVs - checking if they have appropriate qualifications and so on. What you can't get from the application, though – except from references, and I don't find those very reliable - is an idea of how people act in the workplace. I focus on that, by asking questions which should reveal how they'd react in different circumstances and with a variety of colleagues. Interviewing isn't something I'm good at, I'm afraid. I don't trust my own judgement for such important decisions. That's why I usually have about five other people with me, not necessarily from the particular department, though. I realise this prevents me from making the interview seem like an informal chat, but I'm not sure of the overall benefit of that - perhaps it provides an insight into how the applicant thinks and behaves outside work, but that's not crucial. One's trying to assess so many different aspects of potential employees. Time's limited, and you can get bogged down in asking challenging questions relevant to particular duties in the job description. It's easy to forget to allow time for applicants to find out things that are relevant to them. It's sometimes seen just as a courtesy or a way of making them feel comfortable, but it can give you real insight into how they think and react to the post.
我們都忘記了面試有多艱難。面試者走進(jìn)一個(gè)陌生的房間面對(duì)一大排不認(rèn)識(shí)的人問你一大堆棘手的問題。不要對(duì)他們大腦空白感到吃驚。如果你是面試官你要努力讓面試者感到放松,這樣他們才能有條不紊地表達(dá)表達(dá)自己的觀點(diǎn),與此同時(shí),你也能有機(jī)會(huì)對(duì)他們做出正確的評(píng)估。 面試通常都太理論化了。比如,你獲悉面試者關(guān)于市場營銷學(xué)的看法后就拋出一些刁鉆的問題來了解他們是否跟上最新的發(fā)展。但這遠(yuǎn)不如讓他們講一個(gè)他們的親身經(jīng)歷,因?yàn)橥ㄟ^了解他們?nèi)绾翁幚砣粘J聞?wù)來判斷才能說明問題。我知道有些人認(rèn)為這對(duì)于高層來說就是浪費(fèi)時(shí)間,他們覺得你應(yīng)該測試他們?nèi)绾翁幚砼c客戶以及同事的關(guān)系,對(duì)此,我并不贊同。 ——by 石豆豆 from 大家網(wǎng)