科學(xué)60秒:只有高智商是不夠滴
來源：滬江聽寫酷
2011-05-25 00:07
文章較難，大家聽寫填空即可~
If Alice is smart, and Bob’s even smarter, working together they would A) be twice as smart, B) be half as smart or C) form a task force and get nothing done. According to new research, the answer is none of the above. It would actually depend on ___1___.
What makes a group good at what it does? A team of scientists ___2___ and divided volunteers into groups of two to five. And they asked these groups to perform a variety of tasks, from brainstorming answers to questions like “What can you do with a brick?” to team typing blocks of complicated text.
What the researchers found is that the intelligence of individual group members was not a good predictor of how well the group as a whole performed. The teams that did best ___3___: their members interacted well, took turns speaking and included more females than groups that did poorly. The study is in the journal Science.
So if you’re looking for a ___4___ for group smart, don’t automatically reach for the biggest brains. ___5___. And at least one person who knows what to do with a brick.
If Alice is smart, and Bob’s even smarter, working together they would A) be twice as smart, B) be half as smart or C) form a task force and get nothing done. According to new research, the answer is none of the above. It would actually depend on ___1___.
What makes a group good at what it does? A team of scientists ___2___ and divided volunteers into groups of two to five. And they asked these groups to perform a variety of tasks, from brainstorming answers to questions like “What can you do with a brick?” to team typing blocks of complicated text.
What the researchers found is that the intelligence of individual group members was not a good predictor of how well the group as a whole performed. The teams that did best ___3___: their members interacted well, took turns speaking and included more females than groups that did poorly. The study is in the journal Science.
So if you’re looking for a ___4___ for group smart, don’t automatically reach for the biggest brains. ___5___. And at least one person who knows what to do with a brick.
how well they get along put their collective heads together rated high in social sensitivity recipe Try adding some heart
一人天資聰穎，另一人更勝一籌，這兩位要是合作的話會怎樣？ A) 事半功倍 B) 事倍功半 C) 互相推托，一事無成 最新一項研究表明，這三個選項都不是合適的答案，事實上，這兩人相處得如何才是問題的關(guān)鍵。 造就一支優(yōu)秀的團隊靠的是什么呢？一支研究團隊集思廣益，他們將受試者分成幾組，人數(shù)從2至5人不等，并讓各組完成指定任務(wù)，從回答“一塊磚可以用來干什么”之類問題的頭腦風(fēng)暴到團隊合作輸入復(fù)雜文本等等，任務(wù)形式各異。 經(jīng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，各小組成員的智力并不是整組表現(xiàn)的決定性因素。表現(xiàn)突出的小組社交敏感性較高：組員互動有利，各抒己見，且女性成員較多。這項研究報告發(fā)表在《科學(xué)》上。 假如你想找一劑提升團隊能力良方，別習(xí)慣性地去拉攏高智商人才，得多留心，至少得找一個知道磚頭可以干嘛用的組員~