各位又到了每周的寫作部分技巧大放送時(shí)間~之前兩期我們一起學(xué)習(xí)了綜合寫作應(yīng)該如何去記聽力筆記以及如何根據(jù)信號(hào)短語辨認(rèn)出哪些信息是我們需要反映在寫作中的。那么具體應(yīng)該如何確定每一句話的作用以及抓取關(guān)鍵信息呢？今天就是見證奇跡的時(shí)刻啦~

這里先給大家推薦兩個(gè)課程，針對(duì)考托目標(biāo)在95分和105分的小伙伴：新托福簽85沖95名師VIP、新托福簽95沖105名師VIP

首先我們要知道綜合寫作中文章的結(jié)構(gòu)是什么樣子滴~

1st paragraph: leading in + main idea

2nd paragraph: supporting idea 1+ details + (summary)

3rd paragraph: supporting idea 2+ details + (summary)

4th paragraphs: supporting idea 3+ details + (summary)

非常清晰的總分大結(jié)構(gòu)以及

2-4段的主體部分的每一段都是——首句提出反駁分論點(diǎn)以及之后的細(xì)節(jié)支撐

這一結(jié)構(gòu)特點(diǎn)在閱讀和聽力文章都是一致的，讓我們通過一套真題來看一下吧~

閱讀文章的結(jié)構(gòu)如下：

第一段：大背景是人們都在研究叫做Chaco的大房子究竟是干啥用的，有三個(gè)理論很有競爭力。

第二段：第一個(gè)分論點(diǎn)是它的出現(xiàn)純粹為了住人。

第三段：第二個(gè)分論點(diǎn)是建造它是為了貯藏日用食品。

第四段：第三個(gè)分論點(diǎn)是建造它為了祭祀。

隨后聽力文章就各種反駁它，記得嗎？反駁的切入點(diǎn)就是提供閱讀文章中沒有的細(xì)節(jié)。

Unfortunately none of the arguments about what the Chaco great houses were used for is convincing.

First, sure, from the outside, the great houses look like later and Native American apartment but the inside of the great houses casts serious doubt on the idea that many people lived there. I'll explain. If hundreds of people were living in the great houses, then there would have to be many fireplaces, where each family did its daily cooking, but there are very few fireplaces. In one of the largest great houses, there were fireplaces for only around ten families. Yet there were enough rooms in the great house for more than a hundred families, so the primary function of the houses couldn't have been residential.

Second, the idea that the great houses were used to store grain maize; unsupported by evidence. It may sound plausible that large empty rooms were used for storage, but excavations of the great houses have not uncovered many traces of maize or maize containers. If the great houses were used for storage, why isn't there more spilled maize on the floor? Why aren't there more remains of big containers?

Third, the idea that the great houses were ceremonial centers isn't well supported either. You know that mound at Pueblo Alto? It contains lots of other materials besides broken pots, stuff you wouldn't expect from ceremonies. For example, there are large quantities of building materials, sands, stones, even construction tools. This suggests that the mound is just a trash heap of construction material, stuff that was thrown away or not used up when a house was being built. The pots in the pile could be regular trash too, leftover from the meals of the construction workers. So the Pueblo Alto mound is not good evidence that the great houses were used for special ceremonies.

第一段——同樣的大背景，Chaco的用途肯定不是如同閱讀文章那樣的！

第二段——反駁分論點(diǎn)1：雖然外表看起來如此，但是里面的壁爐告訴我們這個(gè)地方?jīng)]有住過那么多人呢。假設(shè)法推翻了閱讀的相應(yīng)理論。

第三段——反駁分論點(diǎn)2：沒有散落的玉米，更沒有裝玉米的容器，讓我們?cè)趺聪嘈潘褂脕韮?chǔ)存吃的呢？同樣的假設(shè)法把閱讀分論點(diǎn)推到。

第四段——反駁分論點(diǎn)3：Chaco當(dāng)然也不是用來祭祀的地方。用了一個(gè)PA的例子來證明閱讀分論點(diǎn)是錯(cuò)的。

最后，給大家推薦幾個(gè)精品托福課程：

英語基礎(chǔ)不同的小伙伴都有適合的課程哦！祝各位考托成功↖(^ω^)↗

·?小編推薦?·